is not me.
> Displaying the posts inline undermines the main reason insulting posts get deleted in the first place.
If you have any good idea to throw, see >>>/λ/20039
> When we discussed the idea last we considered a page via which all non-CP deleted posts could be seen instead.
Why didn't you implement it if you think it was the best. Anyway it's not too late, you should start to implement it now. The more options are the better. People can choose whichever they want. People will use your page if your idea is really good. Don'f forget, "good" will be defined by people, not you nor me.
> "there must be bad moderators"
Again, I'm confident about this, because there are no checking/evaluation system. Why do you believe all they are good without them? You can't show the evidence of that all they are good as well as we couldn't show the deleted posts. They should have implemented a ban page like 4chan, pic related, but they haven't, because they want to hide them. Consider following, if they would have wanted to implement the page, they had to thank to me, at least like you, since I'm preparing the compensation of their lacking function. I think hiding posts deleted by "low quality" is abuse of mod's power basically, so I support fairness of 4chan. I don't know that how you think about 4chan, but 4chan is a great father and they have so many things to learn, for example, ban list and delayed pruning.
The main reason why they are confused is not that deleted posts will be opened soon, but that they have no power to stop people using my script to see all deleted posts. It's funny. I don't know about the cyber-punk, but killing admin power by a userscript is cyber-punkish, isn't it?
BTW, I can show you the evidence of inconsistency of criteria of moderation and a sample of crazy mod. As you see, the lowest quality poster in this discussion is the appleman apparently. He haven't made any contribution about this discussion. But mods are dumb. On the contrary, the moderator of λ said about ban to me >>>/λ/18484
(the issue started from >>>/λ/18426
) I'll never get a ban as long as a retarded poster like the appleman isn't deleted or banned, but the mod stated that I wouldn't get a ban. This was because he thought that he should say that, and this means there are ambiguity in criteria of moderation. I was confident that I would never get a ban as long as moderation worked well, because my post always conveyed information for successful discussion regardless of hostility, and my post is always better than those of deleted, for example, the post of appleman isn't deleted here as I stated. But the mod wasn't confident about whether I was confident or not about being banned. In other words, mods don't share their thoughts or criteria among them. This is harmful for users. At least mods have to try to share it. And hostility of mine is against retarded people, not for admin or mods. However I'm sure that the appleman and the mod are retarded and they must be matured more. And I assume other mods are the same level because no mods criticize them. A crazy mod must be fired by a crazy post like >>>/λ/18433
as long as we may be banned by a crazy post. This is fair, but mods here don't understand this. Again, 4chan has fairness but lainchan doesn't.
Remember, any you can stop people to use my script at anytime by providing the better solution. If you provide the better ban page and people are satisfied with that, they won't use my script because it's the extension which needs to be installed. The site script is basically used by default, this is a huge advantage. Or if you provide better userscript than mine, people will use your script.
Again, remember, here is the internet, where you can provide any better solution to achieve something at anytime, and people will judge them.