[ art / civ / cult / cyb / diy / drg / feels / layer / lit / λ / q / r / sci / sec / tech / w / zzz ] archive provided by lainchan.jp

lainchan archive - /zzz/ - 557

File: 1421291660002.png (36.48 KB, 220x124, MyersBriggsTypes.png)


I think that it lacks implementation, is basically an abstraction of what you think of yourself, and draws the lines incorrectly since most people are in the middle.


Took the test got INFP although INTP also fits me. Looking at the results Feeling vs Thinking were nearly a tie.


As long as it starts with IN you are fine. Feeling/Thinking part is when it gets wrong, because they are not even polar to each other.

The worst combination (even through this test is soykafty as i mention above) is ENFJ and ESFJ, god help them, don't believe the kind words said about them in test, those people are living nightmare, found out it by myself when giving this test out to friends, beware of fuarrrking ENFJ and ESFJ.


File: 1421894692221.png (112.58 KB, 200x134, infj.png)

INFJ. Not sure what to think on these things honestly. They get half of it right, but the other half I'm skeptical of. Same goes for the description of my zodiac sign (Virgo or goat/sheep/ram), although horoscopes I believe to be bs.


horoscopes are written to contain characteristics that fit everyone, with language to make it seem like it's for you especially.
People who try to debunk horoscopes get it wrong because they look at what could make their horoscope incorrect. They'll definitely find something, but it's only because they're trying to debunk in the first place. If you really want to see how the zodiac works, check how many other signs you can fit yourself into.


MBTI's are quite different then horoscopes. They aren't based around arbitrary stars- they're based on how you rate your own traits.
However unlike Jung prophesied, they fail to archetype people into categories.
The best modern purpose they can serve is stating defined character aspects and sometimes helping you to further understand a little bit of your thought process.


You aren't going to get a lot out of MBTI unless you study the functions and put some time into correctly typing yourself. After that you can find tons of objective articles on how you handle stress, how you learn, and tons of other helpful stuff for self development.

Online tests are a good place to start but there's a lot of mistyping because of soykafty questions.


File: 1422047290984.png (714.69 KB, 200x114, nhk-oo.gif)

I got INTJ. I take this test once every 6 - 12 months. Normally, I get INTJ, but sometimes I do get INTP.


I got ISTJ, not so bad


I have done several of these tests, and I always get INTJ. The description fits me very well, and I tend to have a strong preference for movies with INTJ characters, like Hannibal in The Silence of the Lambs or Anton Chigurh on No Country for Old Men. Also, I tend to really like people who are either ENFP or ENTP, which are the best romantic matches for my type.

Overall I think MBTI is a pretty handy model. I have typed almost every person I'm close to over the years (although I find it tricky to decide between S and N), and it's amazing how much more predictable their behavior becomes once you figure their type out.

People always compare MBTI to horoscope, but I really don't believe it's such a superficial model.


I would expect most of us here to be either INTJ or INTP, so that works out. Not that this is very useful… Best tool for knowing yourself is mindfulness about your own actions and contemplative nature.


Why doesn't http://www.16personalities.com/ load over Tor? That's some suspicious soykaf.


INTP fits just perfectly. Well, my horoscope fits pretty good too.

On an imageboard about dreams it would be rather unusual to find overly extroverted and social subjects.

Oh, I have yet to analyze my dream diary.


INTJ. Not sure what to think about it.


>before teen ENTP
>after teen INTP
kinda makes sense…



>mfw i changed from INTJ to INTP-A
Somehow staying inside and not being sociable this summer has lowered my introvertness


i think this system is BS


Agreed. Read up on the Barnum effect. The MBTI is a horoscope for people who consider themselves above reading horoscopes -- perhaps even dumber than horoscopes, since you can't choose the month you were born in, but you CAN manipulate the MBTI to get the answer you want. I know many people who consider themselves introverts, but are in reality quite extroverted and love to overshare about themselves & be the centre of attention. They just don't get the chance to do so very often, so they pretend that it's due to their mysterious lone-wolf soul and not their social ineptitude.


>The MBTI is a horoscope
No, it's not. Go read Jung dude, it is psychology.
If you think it's not a science and is imprecise then I agree with you, because psyche can't really be described by reproducible tests as science require (at least with our current methods). Anyway, it's based on empiricism with many reviews of psychology, psychiatry, even neurology academia and is really useful in many areas.


The MBTI is not well regarded by actual psychologists. The National Academy of Sciences has ruled that "At this time there is not sufficient, well-designed research to justify the use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) in career counseling programs." (p15). http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=1580

Further detail:
"Myers and McCaulley (1985) report test-retest reliabilities from 11 different samples. In these samples, between 24 and 61 percent of the respondents showed stability of type, with a median of 40 percent... McCarley and Carskadon (1983) report only 47 percent of their respondents retained their initial types over a period of 5 weeks... Self-assessment instruments like those represented by the MBTI are likely, at best, to capture a person 's current state and, therefore, should not be considered typologies." (p96-97)

"Myers and McCaulley (1985) present correlational data from 20 studies showing relationships between MBTI scales and a wide variety of other instruments. They concluded that the I-E scale has good construct validity: it has high correlations with comparable scales of other instruments and low correlations with instruments designed to represent other constructs. In contrast, the S-N and T-F scales show relatively weak validity, with only moderate correlations with other instruments designed to measure similar constructs." (p98)

"[Thayer] notes three methodological criticisms of the research: the reporting of data is inconsistent and incomplete; statistical analyses are often incompletely described and may violate convention (e.g., no overall test of significance is calculated before detailed comparisons are made and no attention is given to appropriate baseline data in the analyses); and subjects or judges are often made aware of the hypotheses being tested. These problems prevent drawing conclusions from the studies, many of which are published in the Journals of the Center for the Applications of Psychological Type, Inc. (Journal of Psychological Type and Research in Psychological Type)*; we also note that, to date, few studies appear in mainstream research journals." (p88)
*This is the company that distributes the MBTI and sells training programs for it.

And, to further the comparison to horoscopes:
"What accounts for the popularity of an instrument that is not yet supported by research? Several reasons can be suggested. From the respondents' perspective, the MBTI provides generally positive feedback: the descriptors do not have clinical implications, they are presented as unique positive attributes, and they are sufficiently vague to apply to a large number of people in a wide variety of situations." (p100)

If you need a cute test to massage your ego, go take some "Which Kardashian Are You?" quizzes on Buzzfeed instead of pretending that you're doing Very Rational And Scientific Psychology. And Jung is cool, but what he does is not really science.


Just realized I got too carried away with the validity of the MBTI and didn't address the rest of your post. Yes, current scientific methods aren't great for studying psychology, but that doesn't mean we should gobble up any unsupported pseudo-psychology we can find. "it's based on empiricism with many reviews of psychology, psychiatry, even neurology academia and is really useful in areas"... this is not true. Better personality inventories exist, as well. The Big 5 system is far more reputable, but people don't like it as much as MBTI because it doesn't give you a fun label that you can compare to your favourite celebrities.


the big 5 is also harder to find a reputable online test for


File: 1438821437510.png (21.66 KB, 200x176, 2015-08-06-023639_337x296_scrot.png)

C...Check it guys.


I generally score as INTP.

I believe it is a subset or specific application of trait theory.
From my experience, it seems most long, detailed posts about one's opinion of MBTI come from people who self-report as INT types. Other than that, haven't tried using it for much.

It's not particularly rigorous, but I don't think most people who show interest in the test actually treat is as such, or I would see people actually bring up their MBTI type in contexts other than MBTI threads as something useful in making decisions.

I think it'd be neat to have video games where systems like this are used to make procedurally generated personalities for NPCs.


I am INTP. I'm not a hipster tho


File: 1438856382502.png (2.25 MB, 200x191, 1438120436869.png)


watch where you step, knaves, you are in the presence of a true man.


File: 1438859984455.png (104.76 KB, 200x133, INT-P.png)

I also scored INTP. Not sure why you think of hipsters. Hipster appear more extroverted to me. I'm a physicist.


Hipsters generally score/identify as introverts, but the main reason for that being the fact that tests regarding it generally suck. The 50/50 or any split that has two sides isn't wide enough for the reality.

Most people are between being an introvert and an extrovert - people who get alive around their friends, but are generally shy, people who sometimes self-reflect and automatically assume that pretty much nobody else does it because they don't understand people and so on. I scored ENTP, I think, but I would definitely not identify as an extrovert.

I don't actually think that this test is particularly awful, but it is nowhere near as close as advertised. The generally positive blanket statements aren't completely random, but similarly to horoscopes, they don't ultimately mean much.


A disciple of another sect once came to Drescher as he was eating his morning meal.

“I would like to give you this personality test”, said the outsider, “because I want you to be happy.”

Drescher took the paper that was offered him and put it into the toaster, saying: “I wish the toaster to be happy, too.”


File: 1438870169830.png (103.92 KB, 200x80, Pls, kill me.png)


>based on an arbitrary set of paradigms, who do you perceive yourself to be?
depending on the test and depending when it is taken, i have received anything between inXp and intj.

if there is anything to be gleaned from this system, it lies in understanding the cognitive functions.

that said, due to its self-fulfilling nature, its little more applicable than star signs:
your test results are entirely reflective of your self-image.

to state the obvious, a professional is going to have much more applicable and perhaps actionable information than the results from some self-administered online test that you half-understand.


ENTP, the debater


INXX! just like me


File: 1438905171224.png (29.88 KB, 170x200, Ayyyy.jpg)

>MFW there are other ENTJs on Lainchan

There usually aren't too many of us on imageboards, or so it seems.

So tell me, have you led any groups like they say we are naturally able to? I have, and it is quite fun and enjoyable to me. I do not abuse it, though, but rather try to lead them well; my success shall be proven by theirs.


File: 1438985125522.png (11.69 KB, 200x180, 2015-08-08_00.03.10-ISTP Personality (“The Virtuoso”) _ 16Personalities - Firefox Developer Edition.png)

it managed to identify me as the engineer guy i am but what it says in the ISTP article other than that is BS


>The MBTI is not well regarded by actual psychologists. The National Academy of Sciences has ruled that "At this time there is not sufficient, well-designed research to justify the use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) in career counseling programs." (p15). http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=1580
this is a nice post and despite the fact i just took the test i agree with this


I am an INTP-T


INFJ. This wiki page clarifies the origin of the letters: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jungian_cognitive_functions


File: 1439044085060.png (440.73 KB, 200x150, 1437704048877.gif)

I guess I never really got too deep in any organizational leadership roles (besides maybe Boy Scouts in middle school), but I usually lead study/project groups and other things. I'm naturally quiet, though, so mostly it's just unspoken guidance.


File: 1439044623308.png (594.7 KB, 200x114, lotghpersonalitychart.jpg)

Also, pic relevant.


File: 1439047173275.png (11.39 KB, 200x150, ss+(2015-08-08+at+10.14.32).png)

ENTP, though I seem to be sitting on the edge of extrovert and introvert.

These tests are decent at getting an idea of your personality along with others you know. However, you shouldn't only go by them as you simply cannot break people down into a few distinct groups.


there's a classification for people who don't fit neatly into either category, called an Ambivert


This made me happy.


Horoscopes for nerds. Intj here chummers.


The mind observing itself creates an inescapable thought loop. Trying to shoehorn the workings of the mind into the scientific method, or vice versa, is asking for trouble.

The answers lie within you, around you and in front of you, but only behind you have they been put to paper.

Contrary to popular belief, recent scientific breakthroughs give support to age-old occult knowledge


INT(P/J) btw


Thanks for contributing, I just finished watching this



File: 1446482124873.png (199.31 KB, 200x113, ClipboardImage.png)

Got ISFJ-T this time. I have multiple personality disorder though, and typically all of them are near the center, one time I got 1% on all of them


File: 1446482339364.png (186.39 KB, 200x113, ClipboardImage.png)

And the one from CelebrityTypes:


interesting. if you don't mind my asking, how do your personalities differ?


File: 1446494795635.png (92.69 KB, 200x125, Screenshot from 2015-11-02 20:04:28.png)


File: 1446497140071-0.png (84.13 KB, 200x135, ISTJ_Personality_(“The_Logistician”)_16Personalities_-_2015-11-02_12.41.23.png)

File: 1446497140071-1.png (92.1 KB, 200x120, INTJ_Personality_(“The_Architect”)_16Personalities_-_2015-11-02_12.40.56.png)

I took this test sometime ago during an 8chan thread and got ISTJ - the logistician. This time around I got INTJ - the architect. I don't really put a lot of faith in these sorts of tests since they always seem to fluctuate based on my mood. They're more like horoscopes to me, albeit backed by pseudoscience instead of mysticism.


File: 1446515273315.png (84.27 KB, 200x117, Untitled.jpg)

Is this another test that tells me how much of a special snowflake I am?


lol. i get INTJ when i took it. which i guess kind of suites my quiet & love for isolationism.

but please watch this video because this test is even more soykaf than the political compass test:


God, the MBTI is such bull

I've taken it four times and never got the same result twice.

And why is this in /zzz/


File: 1446656963468.png (98.39 KB, 200x105, infj-t.png)



its psychology related and I didn't want to put it in /r
in retrospect I should have made it more dream related


INTJ, again. I seem to shift between INTP and INTJ when I take these tests. I guess we am in good company here. Me and all you introverts.


File: 1446682923875.png (28.25 KB, 198x200, logician.png)

INTP! 3 percent of the population (80% on Lainchan tho)!


File: 1447140359786.png (79.94 KB, 200x93, ss+(2015-11-09+at+11.22.55).png)

probably far more turbulent than im putting down. also it was somewhat conscious efforts that shifted me more from feeling to thinking as of the past couple of years.


all TJ's should be assertive.
turbulent TJ's are uneffective.

i got INTJ, but got 49/51 in intro/extroversion.
truth is, best people know when to flake to the other side
foe example, a true ENTJ should know when to appear feely or emotional


I did the 16personalities one a few times (which isn't exaclty Myers-Briggs according to themselves)
I scored INFP twice, with a gap of about a year. Another year later I scored INTP
Introvert and Intuitive were always around 80%, F/T always won by 60% over the other, Prospecting was around 60%, and Turbulent at 70%
The only thing that really ever changed was the F/T.

Let's not make conclusions, shall we?


File: 1455229508902.png (116.36 KB, 200x121, 110216 - 11:09:12 PM.png)

Well, seems like a good time to retake that test, lets see...

The INTP personality type is fairly rare, making up only three percent of the population, which is definitely a good thing for them, as there's nothing they'd be more unhappy about than being "common". INTPs pride themselves on their inventiveness and creativity, their unique perspective and vigorous intellect. Usually known as the philosopher, the architect, or the dreamy professor, INTPs have been responsible for many scientific discoveries throughout history.

I am still skeptical of the MBTI test.
Especially since I had to take that test at university a while back at some mandatory bullshit softskill course.
At that time it was ISTJ, now it's INTP.

I'd find it interesting how this whole system holds up over time, my money is more on the pseudoscience side than anything really. Still a good timewaster tough.

I should keep track on how my "personality" changes over time,
according to this test. Could be a fun side project I reckon.


INFP, took this test in Abnormal Psychology.


File: 1455384061905.png (87.8 KB, 200x125, 0012.png)

I have been doing these for years.It seems like i float between INTJ/INTP.It's funny because i always get INTP at the end of the semester(when i am overloaded with work and want some freedom),and INTP at the beginning(when i want to work more so i have a easier time at the end of the semester). I wonder if i am overthinking this.



So do I, technically, though symptoms are close to none now since I haven't been under a lot of stress. Always nice to meet another multiple.



>I wonder if i am overthinking this.

This "test" is pseudoscience, simple as that. It may have a tad bit of merit, i'll say that much, but it is by no means rigorous or thorough enough to take seriously. Essentially a horoscope with a questionnaire.


Usually INTJ, rarely INFJ


>mfw this chart is better than the descriptions on the official website


File: 1455775090899.png (17.86 KB, 200x91, architect 1.jpg)

You are the architect.


You guys should really just consider reading outlines of the individual functions and deciding which one matches your behaviour best, rather than taking these soykaf tests.


It's nerd horoscope. I'm INTP-A apparently. Not at all like I am.


File: 1456063019467.png (104.25 KB, 200x98, maxresdefault.jpg)

So, yeah, it's looks like me generally.


File: 1457072519959.png (215.05 KB, 200x125, 2016-03-03-221304_1680x1050_scrot.png)

Cool, ENTP.
Move outta the way, Nerds :^)


please don't turn this into facebook, lains



my people.


Myers Briggs test is like astrology
Nobody gets negative results, everyone gets vague definitions and some of people even change their personality type over the course of 6 months.
It's arbitrary garbage that will clutter your brain with redundant information about your personality that will keep inforcing itself like positive feedback amplifier.
Stop deluding yourself and just let go.


>over the course of 6 months
please, give me a few drinks and my Myers-Briggs will change over the course of 6 hours


File: 1457760680682.png (128.77 KB, 200x125, screenshot-0312-052924-2016.png)

Soo...... I'm useless at implementation... but I program.... damn


File: 1457826522974.png (20.07 KB, 200x80, My personality.png)

I've taken this test from a different website week ago without knowing about this thread. Here are my results.




>When it comes to accuracy, if you put a horoscope on one end and a heart monitor on the other, the MBTI falls about halfway in between.




so, in other words, it's kinda sorta accurate?


In other words, it is not a passing grade in some places, and a bare D in others.

Another quote from the linked article: "In social science, we use four standards: are the categories reliable, valid, independent, and comprehensive? For the MBTI, the evidence says not very, no, no, and not really."

All it gives you is broad, mostly positive and ultimately irrelevant comments about your personality, which are extremely unlikely to give you any insight, especially since it is largely inaccurate.


b-but it said i'm a "mastermind"! does this mean it's not true??!


Jung was not a psychologist. There was no psychology before the behaviorists, maybe accepting a few earlier researchers as proto-psychologists.

But Jung/Freud are just writing fanfiction. There's no science there. It's not even wrong.

>because psyche can't really be described by reproducible tests

see, this is only true because you're using a word from your fanfiction, 'psyche', that conveniently DOESN'T map to anything that can be measured empirically because it doesn't exist.

But you can open any psychology journal and see empirical science. This goes from very rigorous, and very specific, on say perception studies, to very fuzzy and not very rigorous on the other, say case studies, organizational studies, or otherwise studies that are on the other end of the internal/external validity tradeoff. Psychology IS harder than virtually every other science, but that doesn't make it impossible, just hard. There are cognitive experiments that will break your mind, beautiful in their simple complexity, elegant in their destruction of swaths of possible explanations. Swinney 1972 is the one my favorite professor used at the end of his intro to cogsci class. And all for lexical ambiguity!

Seriously guys, just take the IPIP. Do you seriously need me to put it into a Google form or something for you lazy assholes? You score the Big-5 by adding your answers, that's fucking it.

>of course nobody will take a big-5 inventory and post it here

>"hey lains, I'm close-minded, scatterbrained, not strongly introverted or extroverted, disagreeable, and neurotic! The web page says I'm like Woody Allen!"

I hate the MBTI more than anything else. If I had a time machine and three bullets I would go straight to fucking Vienna and shoot Freud in the face so that we could be spared this shit. I'm 100% sure Watson and Skinner would have done good science without those fucking quacks.


File: 1465984955621.png (69.69 KB, 195x200, osakadahat.jpg)


I'm open minded, introverted, disagreeable, disorganized, and in-between on neurotic


File: 1465988913757.png (53.67 KB, 200x130, lain-iwakura-happy.jpg)

This is where I imagine I would "REEEEEE." But we're civilized here on lain, so you're merely neurodivergent for a lainon. But you still Love Lain™, so you're okay in my book.


File: 1465990061425.png (554 KB, 200x191, lain-vain.gif)

Me too.

Extremely NTP-T. Largely I.


>But you can open any psychology journal and see empirical science. This goes from very rigorous, and very specific
Eh. This science is nowhere near as rigourous or specific as say a physics journal. People lie. Though really it depends on being very careful about knowing what you're measuring. We can measure peoples responses, we cannot measure their experience.


I've never gotten not INTJ. I don't know what I can do with this information. I think the D&D test is better.


I know an INFP-T guy who scored like 100% on I and above 93% on the others


INTP this time. Usually got ISTP. Can't really find any of the positive traits they list in me.


Ayy another ENTJ here. I sort-of just fell in line with being the top of, if not near the top of every social hierarchy I've ever been involved in until recently. It would be a bit funny, if it weren't so predictable.


>99 percent thinking

Hiss Hiss I lizard man


I'm an ENTJ according to work testing but it's all just modern horoscopes anyways. People keep wanting me to run clubs on campus but I don't want to waste valuable time delegating tasks or doing paperwork.


infp-j is pretty accurate i guess


INTJ here. I think the MBTI in itself is a pretty accurate method of describing your personality. There a few problems though. The MBTI tests you that you find in the Wired lack any kind of depth. Most of them will only ask about your actions but ignore your motives. The thing that makes the MBTI interesting and sets it apart from horoscopes are the function. Some may disagree but the MBTI is useless without the functions. INTJ and ISTJ would be almost identical, but they are almost the polar opposite. But if you are willing to learn about the MBTI its pretty useful for self-improvement and to get along better with other people.


INTJ and I think it captures me well


File: 1470859534681.png (52.42 KB, 200x134, 1174290.jpg)

it's whatever. it was kinda nice reading about the types I got, especially the most recent two times I got INTP - parts of the description reminded me of myself in a comforting way, like relieved that other people are like this and its not just me being a weirdo.


historically I've tested as intp/j and more recently as infj.

Its interesting.

Next monday I get one of these done professionally, interested to see how different it turns out. Has anyone else here had a professional testing?


INTP by a factor of greater than 80-20 percent in all fields, Assertive by 52-48.
Sounds about right; I spend my free time in my room, and my job and school in my head. I rarely ever talk to people outside of work, where I'm required to sell shit to customers. I had poor grades in high school but had the top standardized test scores the entire time, since I was too busy listening to music or learning on my own to do any actual school work. That said, however, this test doesn't necessarily bestow much actual "knowledge" in itself -- it's just a generalized label. I don't quite see a use for this beyond encouraging introspection. I guess that's a good thing, but hell that's a convoluted way to do it.


ENTP I think its quite an accurate representation of my quirks and how I act....


People who aren't reading the entire thread - please read this:

MBTI is not, will not, and can not do anything but mostly empty statements that are often entirely inaccurate. The most accurate description of them is "nerd horoscopes". Don't get attached to the semi-arbitrary letter combination you get from the test, it's not you.


i feel bad for you


File: 1472187196534.png (80.65 KB, 200x130, autism.jpg)

Does this mean I'm autistic?


MBTI is jungian psuedoscience. It fails as a reliable test (test-retest reliability is shit) which also means it fails as a personality score. OCEAN/big-5 is the only empirically validated personality measure.



A lot of people think that these tests aren't accurate, which may be true, but I think that they can get pretty close.
I originally took the test a year or so ago, and have taken it again every ~2 months since and have gotten INTJ 4/5 of the times.
I've looked into other websites focusing on the Myers Briggs test and all of them list qualities of the INTJ that I can directly identify with. My family and friends think that this type perfectly suits me as well.
I really enjoy having a personality type, it gives me a quick way to explain myself and reminds me that there are other people in the same boat as me.
Also, it's way better than that zodiac sign bullshit.


I don't like these tests because the questions are answered by me. The accuracy is thus bottlenecked by how well I know myself. When asked for example
>Do you usually stand in the middle of the room, or stick to the corners?
I might answer "HELL YEAH IN THE MIDDLE" because I remember this one occasion when I was tipsy and having a great time and I could seemingly entertain everyone, but otherwise, 99% of the time I'm that silent little anxiety-bag hiding in the corner.
Another point is that most people own't score 95%-100% on every attribute, and thus even though they are put into a category/archetype, it is obvious that they don't fit the description exactly.
While these two things certainly make me vary about the results, I don't need to scream Jung and pseudoscience to point this out, and neither should you.


File: 1473131523089.png (102.26 KB, 200x130, 2016-09-05.png)



16personalities test doesn't take the jungian cognitive functions into consideration with their test. I think that's important to point out.
>Furthermore, unlike Myers-Briggs or other theories based on the Jungian model, we have not incorporated cognitive functions such as Extraverted Thinking or Introverted Sensing, or their prioritization, instead choosing five independent scales and building our types around them.

The functions is where things become more interesting imo, although I don't know a site that has a good test on them.

I guess I could wage slave this site though:
There's some free stuff there. Unfortunately some of things there you need an account for, which costs money.
I'd read the articles too. I think most people just look at how a certain celebrity is type and say "this site's bull soykaf ." Or at least that's what I did.

There's also this site, although I haven't used it much


I routinely get INTP on such tests. They mostly tell me things I already know about myself, which I guess is the point.

Most of the people I know who make a big deal about this kind of thing("OMG I'm such an introvert too!") are insufferable.

Anyway I like them as nice distractions when I have nothing else I'd like to do.


I have taken this test plenty of times and I have always gotten INTP it has never changed even when the questions have.


File: 1473179926952.png (190.97 KB, 200x159, touhou kogasa lost umbrella.jpg)

i had to take this test every year from 6th-12th grade
6th-10th i got intp, 11th-now i got infp
i don't know if i buy into the whole "personality types" thing though, cause didn't the people who made this test believe that it was something that couldn't change with time?
or something like that


I am INFP as well. I don't buy into the whole thing as well, but I it can describe me pretty well at times.


what's going on in that picture?


File: 1474125664334.png (51 KB, 142x200, touhou kogasa and kyouko umbrella in rain.jpg)

kogasa needs to find her umbrella!


Anyone else ISFP?


I've been tested for INFP and ENFP. It really just comes down to what your mood is, that's what I'm getting.



good lord. i'm not even that old, and i only had to take that stupid test once in high school, back in the 00's. even then i knew it was bs.


didn't agree at first, bit after reading the full description I think it makes sense. I got 50-60 in most of the categories, though, so I don't know if I'm really legit.


Meant to reply to >>2843


File: 1474881525895.png (93.71 KB, 200x122, asdasd.png)

no comment.


File: 1474893388320.png (347.66 KB, 200x200, per.png)

INTP. I think thats pretty much me. Found this test strangely accurate...


File: 1474904254547.png (24.2 KB, 200x175, turbulent.png)

so does this have to do with Jung?

that guy is OG.


I think it's pretty meaningless, and taking it seriously is absolutely soykaf.

It just tells you some very basic information about someone (most likely yourself). Some of the information pertains to behaviour, but it's mostly about preference. The thing for me is that I don't see what I'm supposed to do with the information. If I take the test myself, it will already tell me what I essentially know. If I take it for someone close to me, I must know then well enough to reliably do that, that the result I get likely won't tell me anything new. I already know myself, and if I'm doing it for someone else, I need to know them.

Furthermore, there's much more to a person that what can be caught by this model. Two INTJ might be somewhat alike in personality, but preferences, experiences, interests, views and more will still mean that the two can be very different people. Knowing that someone is INTJ won't tell me any of that.

In addition to that, I highly doubt the accuracy of what little it tells you about a person.

For the record, I'm always INTJ/INTP. Sometimes INFJ. Not going to bother doing it again right now.


WOW this test seems accurate af!! INTJ


File: 1474953442903.png (20.47 KB, 176x200, intp.png)

>mfw most people don't know the sheer fulfillment of solving a problem by building a perfect system of abstractions
Well looks like I'm Spock. Again.
No wonder I love writing software for a living.


It's pretty useful if you work in human resources, being able to have a general guideline of how to communicate with people, keeping in mind that individuals are different of course, is invaluable.

You can't know someone by their MBTI results, but you can get a general view of how they approach the world and it helps you empathize and communicate more easily with them.


You're the Man man.


I'm also very interested.


Always get INTP-A whenever I take a MBIT. It's entertaining crap. The only use I have got from these tests is that being an introvert doesn't mean I dislike social situations, just that they drain an introvert's energy. I love a good party but I'll need a week of solitude afterwards to recoup.


File: 1475152234826.png (101.52 KB, 200x113, ayy.png)



Went from INTP to INTJ then ENFP to ISFJ to INTP again X)


Just goes to show you that vague predictions based around a few questions are not an accurate indicator of your personality.


oh yeah? well, why did she place it in a field of other umbrellas with identical handles? what was going through her mind?!


No, it shows that people are always changing, nobody stays the same through their whole life, different experiences shape us, even if it is just a little.


you basically just agreed with him while saying that you disagree.


I got INTP, which seems kind of appropriate, but misses the mark on a lot of aspects as well. I'm very far from systematic, cold, and unfeeling, and I don't like any STEM subjects. The heavy emphasis on positive traits is also kind of strange. I may think a lot but I don't exactly benefit from it.

It's a neat idea but not much more than a sophisticated personality quiz. It would be cool if they managed to narrow it down further someday.


File: 1475755766414.png (105.81 KB, 200x108, ISTJ-T.png)

Most questions are pretty generic and I saw a lot of them repeated on such tests, but this one actually had more results than most.

Interesting, since I used to get INTJ or INTP most of the times.


File: 1475990830626.png (93.46 KB, 200x148, mediator.png)

I wish I was more of a >>2868 or >>2924


>Most questions are pretty generic and I saw a lot of them repeated on such tests
they do that on purpose, dinghole. it's to ensure accuracy of your results. well, if you trust their metric, that is. muahaha!


File: 1476375649684.png (100.43 KB, 200x139, ISTP-T.png)

I've taken this test once a day for the last three days and have gotten the same classification every time.

I feel that it is somewhat limited because of questions such as
>You often find yourself questioning the reason for the existence of humanity
which ignores the amount of faith people have in their religion.

I think that religious beliefs skew the results, as I often found myself not answering a full agree/disagree due to the answer being at odds with what I consider to be the values of Christianity, primarily ones concerning empathy and tolerance for others.

Though if I actually act on this in real life nothing changes from the test and the results should be theoretically accurate?

I guess what it doesn't really account for are liars.
Seems I have answered my own prompt. Disregard this.


>is basically an abstraction of what you think of yourself

This. I usually hide/ignore threads about it wherever I see them, they are often nothing but people bragging about their results as if they mean anything. I tried the test a few times and never finished it. The questions just seemed stupid.


Every day is a little bit too often I think. I'd say try it yearly. It takes some time for questions, and what they bring up on your head, to flush.
that said, I got INFP when I first took it, a year later, and then it switched over to INTP. That letter was pretty insignificant anyway, close to middle.




File: 1476676908721.png (104.81 KB, 128x200, IMG_20161017_020109_911.jpg)



File: 1476681856498.png (102.93 KB, 200x127, 1349727351515.png)

I routinely get INTP, but this is first test I've taken with the last quantifier. I would definitely describe myself as being confident 10% more than not, but maybe I would get a different result if I took this again while not high on confidence boosting stimulants.


All I can see this doing is inflating your ego.


b-but my results are valid and specifically summarized for meee!


this quackery shouldn't be in lain


>I think that it lacks implementation, is basically an abstraction of what you think of yourself, and draws the lines incorrectly since most people are in the middle.
It would probably work better if they passed the test around to everyone who knew you and had them fill it out instead, then draw some kind of mean result. A lot of people would be very, very angry with the results they got.


All I've ever gotten is INFJ every time I've taken the MBTI


File: 1477595759674.png (104.13 KB, 200x135, 6581b2f1ab.png)

INFP. I think this best fits me.


ISFP-T: Adventurer. Interestingly, I didn't remember using this website, but the little image at the end reminded me. I did this a few years back and got the same answer.

It said I'm more prospecting than judgemental, but I'm subconsciously very judgemental.

The rest is correct though. I'm observant, feeling, introverted, turbulent. It seems like it's just trying to echo what I feel about myself.


>It seems like it's just trying to echo what I feel about myself.

That is exactly what it's supposed to do.